Friday, December 14, 2007

Toyota Unveils Personal-Transport, Violin-Playing Robots To Help Take Over The World

TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION (TMC) unveiled two new robots, a "Mobility Robot" and a "Violin-playing Robot"--the newest additions to its Toyota Partner Robots being developed to support people's everyday life.


The mobility robot, which is capable of autonomous movement over uneven ground and around obstacles, provides transport in places where people usually walk; the violin-playing robot, equipped with a total of 17 joints in both of its hands and arms, uses precise control and coordination to achieve human-like dexterity.

Totota Mobility Robot Violin playing Robot
Toyota Partner Robots are envisioned to assist people in four main fields: 1) domestic duties, 2) nursing and healthcare, 3) manufacturing and 4) short-distance personal transport. To this end, TMC's primary developmental focuses are on technology that works in harmony with people--such as that for assistance devices that can help move heavy instruments in a factory, on mobility technology for autonomous movement, on full-body coordination for walking and jumping and on tool manipulation. The two robots presented today represent advances along these lines, with the mobility robot demonstrating achievements in field 4) and the violin-playing robot demonstrating achievements in fields 1) and 2).


Also, TMC announced that it aims to realize practical use of Toyota Partner Robots in the early 2010s by furthering its robotic development and strengthening collaboration among industry, government and academia.


TMC, to help make future society healthy and comfortable, is pursuing sustainability in research and development, manufacturing and social contribution as part of its "three sustainabilities" concept. Toyota Partner Robot development, which involves TMC's approach to making things--including its mobility, production and other technologies--is being carried out with this concept in mind and has thus far resulted in the various entertainment robots presented at the Toyota Group Pavilion during the 2005 World Exposition in Aichi Prefecture, Japan, as well as in a tour-guide robot that began operation earlier this year at the Toyota Kaikan Exhibition Hall at TMC headquarters in Toyota City, also in Aichi Prefecture.



Source: http://jalopnik.com/cars/novelties/toyota-unveils-personal+transport-violin+playing-robots-to-help-take-over-the-world-330647.php

Thursday, December 13, 2007

GPS - Overall Comparision

Best handheld GPS overall.

Reviews say the Garmin GPS GPSMAP 60CSx is the best all-around handheld GPS. The 60CSx gets great scores in reviews for fast map rendering and speedy satellite lock, even from a cold start, due to its SiRFstar III chipset. The rubberized and water-resistant Garmin GPS comes with a 64MB microSD memory card for adding additional maps. North American base maps are preloaded, but reviews say the handheld Garmin GPS really shines when used with optional Garmin MapSource software. The Garmin GPS has a 2.6-inch color screen, an electronic compass, a barometric altimeter, and a special geocaching menu. It weighs 7.5 ounces and runs for about 18 hours on two AA batteries.

Budget handheld GPS.

The Magellan eXplorist 500 LE's biggest virtue is price. Although it doesn't use the latest SiRFstar III GPS chipset (which gets much better reception), it has a 2.25-inch color display, which is unusual in its price range. The 5.4-ounce handheld GPS unit is impact and water resistant. Although reception can be spotty, reviewers find the unit easy to use. On-board memory is limited, but can be expanded by adding an SD memory card.

Lightweight GPS with satellite imagery.

Although it doesn't use the most advanced GPS chipset, the DeLorme Earthmate GPS PN-20 has some unique display qualities, most notably the ability to display satellite imagery of terrain. (Reviewers liken it to a portable version of Google Earth.) The small waterproof yellow receiver weighs just 5.12 ounces and has a 2.2-inch color display. Reviews say that GPS performance is very good even though it doesn't have the latest SiRFstar III chipset. Your choice between this unit and the Garmin 60CSx comes down to whether you want the best accuracy and reception (Garmin) versus the lighter weight and satellite-image display of the DeLorme.

Dual-duty GPS for car and field use.

The Magellan Crossover GPS attempts to combine the capabilities of car and outdoor GPS devices. While reviews say it doesn't outperform separate units, the Magellan is a pretty good value if you want both kinds of GPS. Reviews say the Crossover GPS is rugged and waterproof for outdoor use and has sophisticated vehicle navigation features, including text-to-speech and NAVTEQ maps. It also plays MP3s and has a photo viewer. Real-time traffic updates are an optional upgrade. The unit weighs 7.8 ounces and has a 3.5-inch color touchscreen.

GPS watch for runners.

This waterproof GPS watch is a little bulky, but it can track your movements along with time, distance and laps. The Forerunner GPS uses the SiRFstar III chipset, which reviews say allows it to lock quickly and hold onto satellites, even under heavy cover. The Forerunner 205 (*est. $205) is the same unit, but without a heart-rate monitor. The Garmin Edge 305 (*est. $280) is a very similar unit for cyclists. These units have monochrome displays. They are bundled with software specifically for measuring running and bicycling performance, and are waterproofed to the IPX-7 standard.

Source: http://www.consumersearch.com/www/electronics/gps/index.html

Rumor: TomTom GPS Navigation on the iPhone?

I'll be the first to admit the Google Maps "navigation" on the iPhone is pretty gimpy. So gimpy that I ended up in Acapulco one time on my way to the local Dairy Queen. But, with the iPhone a veritable gold mine for software developers it now seems TomTom may want in on the action. This leaked photo shows what appears to be some kind of a TomTom-branded accessory plugged into the iPod's dock adapter and on the screen is what appears to be the oh-so-familiar TomTom software. Note the use of the words "what appears to be" rather than the normally much more confident word "is."

Questions arise whether or not this picture is real. It is particularly blurry, and appears to be sitting on a table, which is strange because the software shows the iPhone en route to Rotterdamn.

I would hope the TomTom software will be capable of flipping to a horizontal layout depending on the orientation of the iPhone, because that would be too badass to not include. By golly, Apple is going to get into a vehicle one way or another.


Source: http://jalopnik.com/cars/gadgets/rumor-tomtom-gps-navigation-on-the-iphone-333586.php

Utah Firm Wants to Go Where GPS Doesn't

In one high-tech thriller after another, the hero attaches a tiny tracking device on the villain and follows him as blinking dot on a computer screen.

In real life, this kind of technology would be great for tracking pets or kids, even packages or luggage — anything that tends to wander.

But it doesn't really exist.

There are GPS devices, of course, but strap a half-pound GPS collar to a dog and you'll realize it's far from "Mission Impossible." GPS-enabled cell phones are becoming more common, but they have problems, like accuracy indoors, and they aren't cheap.

A Utah company, S5 Wireless, is looking to bring reality closer to the movies, with small, cheap chips that can be powered by a single battery for up two years and tracked indoors and outside, over long distances.

For instance, an S5 chip could go into a dog collar, complete with a battery, in a package about the size of a stick of gum that costs $3 to $4 to make. When the battery runs down, it's time to buy a new collar.

The same concept could be applied to a kid's backpack, with an antenna running through the strap.

"It's like a poor man's LoJack or OnStar," said David Carter, S5's chief executive.

The drawback to the technology is that unlike the Global Positioning System, which is quite literally global, S5's technology would only work where the company has a network of stations to receive S5 signals. S5 is planning to start building those in some major U.S. cities next year.

What the chips do is basically GPS in reverse. GPS satellites operated by the Air Force send signals to receivers in devices like car navigation systems. Those receivers need a line of sight to the sky, so they work only outdoors, and are fairly power-hungry.

By contrast, the S5 chips send radio signals that will be picked up by receivers S5 plans to build. By measuring the difference in the time the signal takes to arrive at three different receivers, S5 can compute the location of the sender to within about 30 feet outdoors, or 45 feet indoors. The same principle can be used for locating some cell phones in an emergency but is much less accurate. LoJack equipment also sends radio signals from a stolen car, but it uses a lot of power and is expensive compared to S5's chips.

"The thing that struck me the most is that their solution allows for very good indoor coverage," said Belgium-based analyst Dominique Bonte, who covers GPS technologies for ABI Research.

Bonte said the weakness of GPS indoors vexes those who want to provide location-based services, like cell-phone messages advertising sales at nearby stores.

Companies like Intel Corp. have experimented with using Wi-Fi hotspots in known locations to fill gaps in GPS. Some GPS devices incorporate motion sensors that estimate the user's location based on movement after the GPS signal is lost.

"There's a lot of activity, a lot of companies, and of course a lot of venture capital which is being made available for those kinds of initiatives," Bonte said. "There is a big belief that whoever comes up with something that's cheap, that works and is available will hit the jackpot there."

To gain a foothold, S5 will give away the designs for its chips, letting anyone make their own or incorporate the functions into existing chips, like those in cell phones. It plans to make money by charging for the location service, though at low rates, around $1 a month, Carter said.

S5's technology isn't ideal for navigation devices, since the chip doesn't know where it is. It couldn't, on its own, plot its position on a map the way a car navigation system does. Instead, it is S5's data center that knows where the chip is.

If you're tracking a dog — or a villain — that's not an issue. The dog doesn't need to know where it is, but the S5 network can tell you via Web browser or cell phone where it is.

Apart from pets and kids, Carter envisions the system being used to track valuable equipment on construction sites and in hospitals, much like LoJack protects cars.

If you don't trust FedEx and UPS to track your package, you could slip a tracking device into it before you ship it, and you'll know where it is. The company has also received grants from the Department of Homeland Security to study the use of its chips in tracking shipping containers. S5 chips could even be built into cell phones to supplement GPS chips where reception is weak, like indoors.

As a bonus, S5 chips could transmit small amounts of data generated by other devices. For instance, a diabetes patient's glucose meter could be monitored remotely.

S5 plans to piggyback on existing cell-phone towers and antennas in building out its network, though officials would not say how much they expect the build-out to cost. To pinpoint a chip's location, S5 needs three receivers within the signal's range, about a mile in cities, Carter said. The company plans to cover "several" major cities next year and 35 cities within three years.

That's a tall order, but the venture's main backer lends it credibility. Billionaire Craig McCaw, who founded one of the country's first cell-phone companies, is S5's majority investor. He also backs wireless broadband provider Clearwire Corp.

S5 hasn't announced any build-out partners yet.

Remarkably, S5 plans to use free, unlicensed spectrum in the 900 megahertz band, which is already crowded by cordless phones. Steve Chacko, S5's director of product marketing, likened the feat of picking up those signals from miles away to extracting a needle from a haystack. But he said sophisticated low-power radio technology makes S5's plan viable. Its transmissions won't interfere noticeably with other devices using the spectrum, he said.


Source: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jYMuoLpzfwC-qMoRUXnOLUz-zkdwD8TGQCUO0

Front-projection TVs

















At the top of the screen-size ladder, you'll find displays that don't really qualify as TVs: front projectors. These light cannons can easily fill 100-inch screens, but they're not for everybody since they require a light-controlled environment and plenty of room. Plus, for optimal picture quality, you'll want to buy a dedicated screen, although you can use a white wall in a pinch. Screen makers such as Da-Lite and Stewart have special, low-gain screens designed to improve black-level performance for LCD and DLP projectors.

CRTs are also used in front-projectors; think of those three-tube monstrosities that hang from the ceiling in the coach compartments of older airplanes. We won't discuss them here, however, namely because CRT projectors are quite expensive and are generally reserved for high-end, custom installations, where they put the local cineplex to shame. We'll forgo a discussion on LCoS front projectors, which are also generally quite expensive, until we review one.

DLP, LCD, and LCoS projectors, on the other hand, often cost much less than their rear-projection cousins and sometimes much more. All three technologies project the kind of huge picture--from units as small as a shoebox--that you enjoy at the theater.

Upside:
Downside:
Forecast:
Can get extremely bright; decent uniformity; generally better black-level performance than LCD.
More expensive than similar-resolution LCD models; rainbow effect.
Already the most popular technology for home-theater projection, new less-expensive 720p versions will make DLP even more desirable.

DLP-based projectors come in all prices, resolutions, and picture qualities, so it's tougher than usual to generalize about them. That won't stop us from saying, in general, that DLP projectors can produce a brighter image than their LCD counterparts, and their black-level performance is also usually slightly better. DLPs suffer from the same rainbow effect as their rear-projection brethren, although very expensive three-chip models do not.

Historically, 720p resolution DLP units have cost significantly more than the LCD competition, but in the last year, a slew of more affordable 720p DLP projectors have begun to hit the market. They still cost a bit more than the LCDs and usually don't offer features such as lens shift, but nonetheless, they're destined to seriously increase the popularity of HDTV-resolution DLP models. At the other end of the spectrum, true 1080p resolution DLP projectors are available, such as the Marantz pictured above, that cost a bundle and perform extremely well. The extra resolution of 1080p is especially evident when an image is blown up to projector size.

Upside:
Downside:
Forecast:
Usually less expensive with more features than DLP models of the same resolution.
Some screen-door effects; often not as bright as DLP models.
The advent of cheap DLP models is forcing LCD to improve in every regard, as well as drop in price.

LCD and DLP are very close in terms of performance, and even LCD's ability to produce good blacks has improved quite a bit. DLP still enjoys a slight edge in contrast ratio, however, mainly because its projectors can get a bit brighter than those of LCDs. The screen-door effect, which appears as a fine grid of pixels overlaying the screen, is also more noticeable on most LCD projectors. As we mentioned above, however, 720p LCD projectors still enjoy more features than their budget 720p DLP competition, including highly desirable items such as horizontal and vertical lens shift. No consumer-priced 1080p LCD projectors are currently available.

Upside:
Downside:
Forecast:
Excellent black levels on SXRD models; good value for 1080p projection.
Inaccurate color on SXRD models; some convergence errors.
As long as Sony continues selling SXRDs, LCoS will challenge DLP among high-performance projectors.

Until Sony's VPL-VW100 came along, there were no 1080p resolution projectors that could be optimistically called "affordable." Now its step-down brother, the VPL-VW50, sells for around $5,000 and holds the title as the most affordable 1080p projector on the market. We expect even less-expensive SXRD models to come out this year. JVC announced an LCoS-based unit of its own, the DLA-HD1, that we haven't tested yet. Its specs look promising though.


Source: http://www.cnet.com/4520-7874_1-5108443-4.html?tag=arw

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Rear-projection TVs: CRT, DLP, LCD, and LCoS

Thinking of going big? Rear-projection HDTVs still offer the biggest screen for your buck, although falling prices among big-screen plasmas--58 inches and up--are forcing RPTV makers cut prices on their own. It's pretty obvious, in fact, that eventually RPTVs will go the way of the dodo as flat-panel HDTVs take over completely, but we're still years away from that. Rear-projection sets start at a mere 37 inches (diagonal), but the most popular models are 55 inches and larger. Their big screens hide two basic varieties of display technology: old-fashioned CRT tubes and microdisplays that use DLP, LCD, or LCoS technology. Here's an introduction to the choices.

Upside:
Downside:
Forecast:
Relatively inexpensive.
Deep cabinets; need periodic maintenance; not ideal for bright rooms; narrow viewing angle; softer image than microdisplays; most cannot display computer signals.
These dinosaurs are quickly being phased out in favor of lighter, lamp-driven microdisplays, and their demise is clearly in sight.

Tube-based RPTVs used to rule the big-screen roost, but unless you're really strapped for cash or willing to get professional calibration to achieve the best home-theater image quality, we recommend skipping the tube in favor of a microdisplay. Tubes are not as bright as microdisplays, and they require careful setup and regular convergence adjustments to achieve sharp focus and maintain alignment of the red, green, and blue CRTs.

Low prices will keep CRT-based big-screen TVs in the game for another year or two, and videophiles may indeed point out that the best examples of this technology still provide superior image quality in many ways. They still have better black levels than any microdisplay; they generally have deep, well-saturated color; and they can achieve a sharp picture if adjusted properly. Truly good-quality CRT-based big-screens are basically nonexistent now, however, and the product category as a whole is destined to die off sooner rather than later.

Microdisplays

A new generation of rear-projection televisions has effectively succeeded CRT-based RPTVs. These sets are called microdisplays because they're based on one or more microchips that contain thousands or millions of pixels. DLP, LCD, and LCoS are all competing types of chips. Every current microdisplay rear-projection TV contains a lamp that bounces light off of (DLP and LCoS) or through (LCD) its chip and onto the big screen. Below is a brief look at how microdisplays differ from standard televisions, as well as a cheat sheet to give you a quick grasp of the many abbreviations and terms in this category. More in-depth explanations of each technology follow.
  • The lamps inside these sets, which cost $200 and more, must be replaced every 3,000 to 10,000 hours, depending on technology and conditions of use. You can replace most lamp assemblies yourself.
  • The lamps take from 20 seconds to a minute to warm up and cool down. During the warm-up phase, the image is either dim or completely dark.
  • The TVs are lighter and slimmer than CRTs, and you almost always need a stand to get them at eye level.
  • Most can display computer sources, as well as high-definition and standard TV, and usually look better when fed a digital (DVI, HDMI, or FireWire) rather than an analog connection.
  • Unlike rear-projection CRT sets, all microdisplays can get quite bright without losing detail, so they're perfectly viewable in brightly lit rooms.
Microdisplay cheat sheet
DLP
LCD
LCoS
Full name
Digital Light Processing
Liquid crystal display
Liquid Crystal on Silicon
Chipsets, variations, and brandings
HD2, HD2+, HD3, xHD3
3-LCD, H-LCD
HD-ILA, SXRD
Principal brands
Texas Instruments (chip producer), Samsung, Toshiba, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, LG, RCA
Sony, Hitachi, Panasonic, LG
JVC (HD-ILA), Sony (SXRD), Brillian
Main picture-quality
advantage(s)
Good pixel fill and uniformity; deep blacks in better models
Lack of rainbow effect
Excellent pixel fill; lack of rainbow effect; deep blacks in better models; 1080p chips have all 1,920x1,080 pixels
Main picture-quality disadvantage(s)
Rainbow effect; low-level noise; wobulated resolution on many chips
Black level; screen door effect; uniformity
Uniformity
Pervasive myth
Causes headaches
Degrades over time faster than other microdisplays
Subject to burn-in

Upside:
Downside:
Principal brands:
Forecast:
Very good black-level performance on the best models; excellent uniformity; wide selection of brands and price points.
Rainbow effects; some low-level video noise; currently no nonwobulated 1080p models.
Samsung, Toshiba, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, LG, RCA
DLP is only getting cheaper and more popular, and the best examples deliver excellent image quality.

DLP was developed by Texas Instruments, and the company sells many types of DLP chips to numerous traditional and not-so-traditional TV makers, making DLP the most widespread and popular microdisplay technology.

A tremendous range of DLP-based sets are available today, and their image quality varies greatly according to price and manufacturer. Entry-level models, among the least expensive microdisplays you can buy, generally have 720p native resolution (1,280x720). Step-up models have 1080p resolution (1,920x1,080), which can deliver sharper images with 1080i HD and computer sources (more info on 1080p).

Both 1080p and some 720p DLP televisions use a technique called "wobulation" to achieve their stated native resolutions. With wobulation, which Samsung calls SmoothPicture, the DLP chips have half as many physical pixels (a 1080p chip has 960x1,080 pixels). A tiny mirror or lens moves rapidly back and forth to alternately create the first and second halves of the image and achieve 1,920x1,080 resolution. Wobulation can produce good results, and on some 1080p TVs, it can technically deliver all 1,920 lines of horizontal resolution; on other sets, it makes the image look softer. As usual, performance varies from model to model.

One potential problem with DLP sets is known as the rainbow effect. Some people can see brief streaks of color on these TVs, especially in images with black fields and some bright features (such as a spaceship). This is caused by the fact that the single DLP chip uses a color wheel to create red, green, and blue, and hence all colors. The occurrence of these rainbows has been significantly reduced with the advent of newer, faster color wheels, and most people who watch a DLP never see rainbows at all (and the few who do usually only see them occasionally). DLP HDTVs do introduce a bit more low-level video noise--which can look like tiny dancing pixels or motes in shadowy areas--than other microdisplay TVs.

New DLP technologies address a few of these issues. Samsung sells HDTVs, such as the HL-S5679W, that use LEDs instead of the traditional bulb. In addition to lasting 20,000 hours, the LEDs eliminate the rainbow effect, although as noted in our review, the TV had some uniformity issues. The company announced new LED-powered DLPs for 2007 as well, which may address these issues. Mitsubishi, for its part, demonstrated a laser-powered DLP HDTV last year that hits the market later in 2007.

Upside:
Downside:
Principal brands:
Forecast:
No rainbow effect.
Blacks not as deep as the best LCoS or DLP sets; some uniformity issues; visible screen-door effect.
Sony, Hitachi, Panasonic, LG
LCD will continue to challenge DLP among entry-level sets, and the appearance of 1080p versions could extend its appeal to higher-end buyers.

Though less popular than DLP models, LCD-based rear-projection sets should continue to do well as long as Sony stays in the game. The company has developed a step-up chip, however, which it calls SXRD (see below) and puts in its higher-end rear-projection HDTVs. We did not review any LCD-based rear-projection HDTVs in 2006, but this year we're excited to check out Sony's new models, which include some of the first 1080p LCD-based rear-projectors and slimmer cabinet designs

Judging from previous models we've tested, the best DLP and LCoS sets still hold the lead in producing the deepest blacks, but LCD chips have made serious improvements. Translation: Unless you have them side by side, you probably won't be able to tell which of the two delivers the deepest blacks. Prices for similarly sized DLP and LCD TVs will likely remain close as big-brand behemoths face off and try to outdo one another.

Another area where DLP and LCoS have an image-quality advantage is something called the screen-door effect. If you sit close to an LCD--at least the 720p versions we reviewed in the past--you may notice a faint grid of pixels, much like a screen door, overlaid atop the image. You're seeing the space between the pixels, which is more visible on LCD than on the other two microdisplay technologies. It's generally not noticeable even on LCDs unless you sit closer than twice the diagonal measurement of the screen. We expect the new 1080p LCDs to have a much less noticeable screen door effect, if they have it at all.

LCD and LCoS also generally have more white-field uniformity issues than DLP. With expansive flat fields, such as the ice in a hockey rink, some LCD and LCoS sets introduce slight discoloration into some areas of the screen. This effect varies widely from model to model, but DLP sets are generally immune.

LCD's big advantage over DLP--one that it shares with LCoS--is its lack of the rainbow effect, a big deal if you see rainbows on DLP sets and a moot point if you don't. Don't put too much stock in the slightly higher native resolution afforded by some LCD chips; in the big scheme of things, 1,386x788 doesn't provide much of a sharpness boost over 1,280x720. DLP makers have also claimed that the organic compounds in LCD chips degrade over time, while DLP chips do not. Though this is essentially true, it has little impact on a product's real-world life span because LCD chips still last very long time under normal working conditions. While LCoS and DLP makers tout the "inorganic" nature of their chips, we don't consider that a major reason to choose one technology over another.

Upside:
Downside:
Principal brands:
Forecast:
Excellent black levels on the best models; great interpixel fill; no rainbow effect; true 1,920x1,080-pixel chips on 1080p models.
Some uniformity issues.
JVC, Sony, Brillian
As long as Sony sticks with SXRD, LCoS will continue to be regarded as a worthy competitor to the best DLP HDTVs.

LCoS has been through some trying times, and Philips, Toshiba, and Mitsubishi are among the heavy hitters that produced early-generation models then decided to abandon the technology. Intel even floated a rumor that it would enter the LCoS market, which has since proven untrue. Today, JVC and Sony are the only major LCoS makers, and each company's HDTVs have performed very well in our tests. It remains to be seen whether other manufacturers will jump on the LCoS bandwagon, although chipmaker Brillian has an expensive LCoS line of its own.

JVC (HD-ILA): JVC has been producing LCoS-based front projectors for years under the D-ILA (Direct-drive Image Light Amplifier) brand, and in 2004, the company proffered a line of rear-projection sets, exemplified by the HD-52Z575 and employing yet another acronym: HD-ILA. JVC's HD-ILA expanded in each succeeding year, including well-performing models like 2006's HD-56FN97. We're excited to check out the new sets, especially the extra-slim HD-S998 series.

Sony (SXRD): Much like JVC, Sony rebranded its LCoS chip, choosing to call it SXRD (Silicon X-tal Reflective Display or Silicon Crystal Reflective Display). In 2006 we reviewed two models, the KDS-60A2000 and the step-up KDS-60XBR2, that delivered excellent picture quality. Despite their high prices, Sony's SXRD sets remain extremely popular. The company has announced that its entry-level 2007 SXRD sets, the KDS-A2020 series, is basically unchanged from last year's A2000, so we eagerly await details on the 2007 XBR models.


Source: http://www.cnet.com/4520-7874_1-5108443-3.html?tag=arw